Point taken. This is a needless waste of life, and in this instance that waste of life was caused by two things:
1) lack of attention by the person behnd, who didn't slow
2) the speed camera
We are all guilty of momentary lapses in concentration, but the simple facts are thus....
No camera = motorcycle would not have braked for no apparent reason = car behind would not have piled in to it.
however - I go back to my earlier point. The speed camera was placed to enforce the speed limit in place on the road.
Rubbish.
We are constantly having it hammered down our throats that cameras are there for our safety....that particular camera was placed on a stretch of motorway where it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference whether someone was driving at 70mph or 77mph (other than to their wallet and license).
Even traffic cops themselves openly admit they won't bother with you unless you are in excess of 80mph on a motorway (conditions permitting), so why some continue to believe that a camera knows better than a trained human being is beyond me.
One thing I do know for sure....fook living in the same world as the individual that believes a camera will solve a problem.
This could have been easily caused by any other road obstacle - imagine if the motorcyclist had to slow abruptly for a rock in the road or some other blockage - the result would, unfortunately, have been the same.
I have ridden at competition level since the age of 9, and legally since the age of 16 on a public highway....attaining a full motorcycle license 10 days after turning 17 and jumping straight on to a GSX750.
If I (or anybody I know) had encountered an obstacle on the road at motorway speeds, we sure as $hit wouldn't be putting the anchors on.....trust me on that one.
I'm not saying that the motorcyclist was speeding - he could well have been entering a village where the limit dropped from, say 60 to 30, in which case he would have slowed anyway.
He wasn't entering anything, he was on a bloody motorway!