Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.5 V6 engine.  (Read 6302 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #15 on: 05 February 2013, 23:09:50 »

2.5 has single outlet tailpipe  so not as throaty as 3.0 twin outlet tailpipe but you can swap tailpipes ;)
Had Kevins 3.2  here Saturday-sounded like mine TBH  :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36412
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #16 on: 05 February 2013, 23:10:01 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
I got manual saloon -heavy clutch made my thigh ache(motorbike prang) so easier for me+auto quicker from standstill-+ look at cost of dmf clutch kit :'( :'(

Yeah, the manual setup on the Omega is not the best, sadly. Clutch pedal feels like it has your knee up around your ear before it starts biting. ;D The throw on the gearstick is a bit long for my liking too.
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Brikhead

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West-Mids.
  • Posts: 1540
  • Sleeping. Do not disturb.
    • 2003 chitroen Saxo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #17 on: 05 February 2013, 23:10:09 »

One thing I'd like to clear up does anyone think the 2.5/3.0 sound much better than the 2.6/3.2 or is this just my imagination playing tricks ?

Maybe psychological because some may think four cats restricts the sound compared to two on the earlier cars?
Logged

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #18 on: 05 February 2013, 23:11:28 »

Personally prefer 2.5 mine done 242055m so far and purrs like a kitten
My 3.0 preferred to roar. :y
not at idle or you got problems :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #19 on: 05 February 2013, 23:14:31 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
I got manual saloon -heavy clutch made my thigh ache(motorbike prang) so easier for me+auto quicker from standstill-+ look at cost of dmf clutch kit :'( :'(

auto has no chance against manual and you dont have to use dmf..
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #20 on: 05 February 2013, 23:16:11 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
I got manual saloon -heavy clutch made my thigh ache(motorbike prang) so easier for me+auto quicker from standstill-+ look at cost of dmf clutch kit :'( :'(

Yeah, the manual setup on the Omega is not the best, sadly. Clutch pedal feels like it has your knee up around your ear before it starts biting. ;D The throw on the gearstick is a bit long for my liking too.

yep..pedal travel is long.. I felt it much more when I change cars.. but you get used to it..
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36412
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #21 on: 05 February 2013, 23:18:20 »

yep..pedal travel is long.. I felt it much more when I change cars.. but you get used to it..

I do wonder if it could be improved. I guess clutch needs a different diameter master cylinder or moving the pivot point (or just a shorter pedal perhaps?).

Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #22 on: 05 February 2013, 23:18:28 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
I got manual saloon -heavy clutch made my thigh ache(motorbike prang) so easier for me+auto quicker from standstill-+ look at cost of dmf clutch kit :'( :'(

auto has no chance against manual and you dont have to use dmf..
standard ;) and i got auto + manual-Auto definitely quicker of the mark :y got 3.0 manual/2.5 auto
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #23 on: 05 February 2013, 23:21:46 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
I got manual saloon -heavy clutch made my thigh ache(motorbike prang) so easier for me+auto quicker from standstill-+ look at cost of dmf clutch kit :'( :'(

auto has no chance against manual and you dont have to use dmf..
standard ;) and i got auto + manual-Auto definitely quicker of the mark :y got 3.0 manual/2.5 auto

an auto using half clutch while.. forget it..
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39758
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #24 on: 05 February 2013, 23:25:15 »

....
I do wonder if it could be improved. I guess clutch needs a different diameter master cylinder or moving the pivot point (or just a shorter pedal perhaps?).

Yes! Just bin the left hand pedal.  :y :y
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39758
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #25 on: 05 February 2013, 23:26:38 »

....
auto has no chance against manual and .....


but we are talking about a 1750kg saloon, not a 'pocket rocket' ....... who cares?  ::) ::) ;) :y
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #26 on: 05 February 2013, 23:38:13 »

The 2.5 manual i had was nice , 3.0 auto just suits the omega much better imo and not made of chocolate  ;)
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #27 on: 05 February 2013, 23:40:10 »

yep..pedal travel is long.. I felt it much more when I change cars.. but you get used to it..

I do wonder if it could be improved. I guess clutch needs a different diameter master cylinder or moving the pivot point (or just a shorter pedal perhaps?).

never tought about it.. probably..  :-\
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #28 on: 05 February 2013, 23:42:14 »

....
auto has no chance against manual and .....


but we are talking about a 1750kg saloon, not a 'pocket rocket' ....... who cares?  ::) ::) ;) :y

Andy , I have used both on the same car..may be something personal but I never choose slowest option ;D
 
ps: nowadays there are some serious projects on clit :-X
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39758
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #29 on: 05 February 2013, 23:46:36 »

....
Andy , I have used both on the same car..may be something personal but I never choose slowest option ;D

The auto/manual 'debate' is a personal thing, but many people don't give an auto a chance & judge it by a quick drive of a friend's car ...... get themselves confused when they try pressing pedals that they don't have & then vow they'll never drive another auto car again. IMHO the manual Omega is horrible to drive (based on a short drive of a 2.5TD) and is more suited to 2 pedals.  :y :y
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.013 seconds with 17 queries.