that reminds me, it was partly due to fitting oe on the rear that persuaded me to dump the new tc pads on the front in favour of oe all round.
Parts man supplied the tc front disc pad set. But being vented discs on the rear of my car they supplied oe to go with them.
So with tc pads and new discs on the front and oe pads and new disks on the rear i set off to enjoy my brand new brakes and the better performance i was expecting, considering my old pads and discs where totally cabbaged, they must be better right?
Only the rear showed a marked improvement, the rear seemed to squat, like pulling the hand brake when moving, and no great response from the front. So fitted oe on the front as well and bingo. Balanced braking front to back, if you see what i mean, better bite, well happy. Could feel the differance first press of the pedal reversing out of the drive. Didnt notice any bedding in needed either, although i did go steady on them for the first 200 miles.
Really do not understand the approach to tc pads on here, bar price of course which is understandable.
The thought also occurs, if the servo is designed to be progressive, why take away the pads which presumably where designed to work with it? Lets face it, given you get what you pay for in life, how can £14 a set pads match a £70 set for performance. (They are actually £100 retail iirc)
The Boy takes the view that oe wont last any longer than tc with his driving style on his personal test track iirc. Which is a very valid point, if oe over heat at the same rate tc do that would make it a very expensive game. But do they.....?