1
General Discussion Area / Re: The "Leave" campaign
« on: 16 June 2016, 14:38:51 »
That sounds dangerously reasoned and thought through, using verifiable facts and as such has no part of the brexit debate.
Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section
Do people not think the fact that none of this is clear exposes the central flaw of brexit - that it simply hasn't been thought out.
Its like a shopping list of wishful thinking.
That is exactly what has persuaded me to settle on a reluctant and guarded Remain vote. All the Leave campaigners have published is a vague suggestion that it will be OK, with no idea of how that will be the case. Their continual implication that our immigration and economic problems will instantly improve is especially insulting.
I think both sides overlook a fundamental issue with trade. All this talk of barriers going up, no trade, trade deals taking years . (all Threats and Fear statements by the way) overlooks a fundamental issue. Vested interests run trade and commerce. No way will they want things to stop working. The ships would stop running, mines would stop mining, smelters would stop smelting, docks would have nothing to load/unload, logistics would have nothing to deliver. etc etc. Europe and possibly the world would go into recession. Vested interests wouldn't have that. How do countries with no trade deal manage to trade?
No I can confidently predict cars will still be made and still astonishlingly be sold. Salad crops will still be grown and sold as will beef and French wine. Too much at stake to not do so.
I think there is something fundamentally wrong with assuming that we just pick up from the eu deal.
It aasumes that the foreign state or organisation is completely passive and just says 'yes sir' when boris or nigel knock on their door after brexit asking for a trade deal.
It ignores the possibility that they are independent entities who can turn around and say 'well our last agreement was with the eu, not with you. We are starting the negotiation at a different position'.
Brexiters treat this possibility with 'well we are british so we can ignore this'.
I find this argument very difficult to swallow.
The world owes us nothing as far as trade goes.
You're completely right that the world owes us nothing.
But you are also completely ignoring the fact that we are a large consumer market and it will be as much in those independent countries interests to engage with us as it is ours to engage with them.
Especially, after the amount of money that the Chinese are ploughing into these isles.
Its always going to be in China's interest to sort thing out quickly as well as our own
http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7379/CBP-7379.pdf
China is 3.6% of UK exports. USA is 15% ish. EU is 43.7%.
Which is the more important?
Its just as important to China as it is to the USA or the EU.
You just sit down with them individually and start with whatever terms are current.
If both sides are happy and pleased with want they are getting then bobs your aunty and you scribble it down and get on with life
Things only get difficult when one or the other side wants it too which as said is in nobody's best interest
I suppose the million dollar question is why should other countries accept our terms? On what basis?
I suspect an independent UK's terms would be a lot less onerous and demanding than the EU's.
All Britain will want to achieve from a trade deal is the ability to trade freely with that country, with minimal paperwork and low or zero tariffs.![]()
I can't see Britain demanding contributions to our budget, the right of our people to live and work in that country and maybe even the regulatory burden would be less onerous.
In theory it should be quick and simple. Just 2 countries thrashing out a deal, which the US and Australia managed in 2 years.![]()
How long have they been negotiating TTIP?