I was seriously considering taking a degree next year , subject - Take That, the early years. The fees are putting me off though.

So they should.

Having gone through university back when it was all paid for I think the levels of fees currently being touted would make me seriously reconsider whether I want to end up £30k+ in debt at the start of my career just for a certificate, which is a shame for those for whom university education is the right choice.
It's a product of B.Liar's ridiculous assertion that 50% of school leavers need a degree and the proliferation of useless degree courses, IMHO. The state simply can't fund that.
Mine was an engineering degree and pretty much full time education: 9-5 most days with lab sessions and lectures with a good bit of work to take home too.
Even back then there were other students studying other disciplines doing useful activities for no more than a handful of hours a week. Back then I wondered at the sense of the public purse funding this and I don't think it's got any better, nor will it if we are to educate 50% of school leavers to degree level. :-/
I'm not trying to belittle anyone's education here. I just don't believe university is the answer to most people's (or employer's) needs. University is there to set people up for a career in academic research not for the career of practical work at the coal-face in industry that most people end up following.
The fact that most students (myself included) leave after a bachelors degree, go into industry and then have to learn on-the-job from a practical perspective rather than a theoretical perspective how to get the job done shows how irrelevant most degree courses are to real jobs.
I think what we need is to get back to the 1960's level of 20% or so of people going to university and then, mostly, into academic research with a proper government grant but to fill the gap with decent, more practical training that will put people straight into jobs in industry.
Kevin