So what have you done to your car today?

Started by Loo-knee, 28 April 2011, 21:20:22

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lampynoiseboy

Quote from: chrisgixer on 26 May 2012, 02:01:54
Oh take no notice, even with a chip his couldn't pull away from mine. Without a chip, no chance.

*ducks*  :P
Trouble strikes in series of three's, but when working on the car, the next job after a series of three is not the fourth job -- it's the start of a brand new series of three

MikeDundee

I've done nothing, but last week had two new tyres put on the back 180 bucks each, to get through the MOT, which it did with only one advisory on the handbrake :y michelins all round now.

noel

put my preformance filter back on just to pee the local roy bacers off ;D ;D
oh well that's another day done

noel

Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 26 May 2012, 00:48:08
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 22:04:40
Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 25 May 2012, 14:01:24
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 13:51:57
Had 500m from a tank in the 3.0l auto.  Never got close to that in the 3.2.  The 3.2 simply isn't anywhere near as economical.

Oddly, my current 3.2 seems better than both 3.0's I had before it....assumed better engine as newer design- even tho slightly larger?
Suspect the poxy, useless lower CR doesn't help matters...

to prove my lack of knowledge once again.......lower cr?
your not on your own with that one, i dont do abbreviations either ;D ;D
oh well that's another day done

TheBoy

Quote from: chrisgixer on 26 May 2012, 02:01:54
Oh take no notice, even with a chip his couldn't pull away from mine. Without a chip, no chance.
I was giving you a good tow ;D

I suspect my compression isn't what it once was, going by oil consumption.  But the old girl kept you honest despite her extra 5-6yrs age and extra 100k miles...

But then this part of the thread is about fuel consumption differences, and no matter how I drive, I'll always get 250+ miles from 67l of LPG from the 3.0l. Remind me how many miles you get from a tank (bearing in mind, I don't think our driving styles should create much difference in MPG)?
Grumpy old man

TheBoy

Quote from: noel on 26 May 2012, 10:15:05
put my lower preformance filter back on just to pee the local roy bacers off ;D ;D
Fixed that post for you ;)
Grumpy old man

feeutfo

Quote from: TheBoy on 26 May 2012, 11:28:00
Quote from: chrisgixer on 26 May 2012, 02:01:54
Oh take no notice, even with a chip his couldn't pull away from mine. Without a chip, no chance.
I was giving you a good tow ;D

I suspect my compression isn't what it once was, going by oil consumption.  But the old girl kept you honest despite her extra 5-6yrs age and extra 100k miles...

But then this part of the thread is about fuel consumption differences, and no matter how I drive, I'll always get 250+ miles from 67l of LPG from the 3.0l. Remind me how many miles you get from a tank (bearing in mind, I don't think our driving styles should create much difference in MPG)?
fit injectors that don't lag then we'll see. :)

feeutfo

How much bhp is that chip worth, allegedly?

Olympia5776

Eventually got round to fitting the OEM Park Pilot system that I bought off Twiglet about 18 months ago......... :-[
This replaced an el cheapo system that after being removed was fitted to my van to replace a worn out system that I fitted 5 years ago......
Beep ....Beep.....Beep....... :y

Shackeng

This week on my 3.2 Elite I've changed the cambelt, thermostat, plugs, changed the brake fluid, and I'm well satisfied, but knackered. ::) ::) ::)

jonnycool

Quote from: noel on 26 May 2012, 10:19:29
Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 26 May 2012, 00:48:08
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 22:04:40
Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 25 May 2012, 14:01:24
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 13:51:57
Had 500m from a tank in the 3.0l auto.  Never got close to that in the 3.2.  The 3.2 simply isn't anywhere near as economical.

Oddly, my current 3.2 seems better than both 3.0's I had before it....assumed better engine as newer design- even tho slightly larger?
Suspect the poxy, useless lower CR doesn't help matters...

to prove my lack of knowledge once again.......lower cr?
your not on your own with that one, i dont do abbreviations either ;D ;D

Compression Ratio?
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving probably isn't for you

Auto Addict

Quote from: jonnycool on 27 May 2012, 04:52:37
Quote from: noel on 26 May 2012, 10:19:29
Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 26 May 2012, 00:48:08
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 22:04:40
Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 25 May 2012, 14:01:24
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 13:51:57
Had 500m from a tank in the 3.0l auto.  Never got close to that in the 3.2.  The 3.2 simply isn't anywhere near as economical.

Oddly, my current 3.2 seems better than both 3.0's I had before it....assumed better engine as newer design- even tho slightly larger?
Suspect the poxy, useless lower CR doesn't help matters...

to prove my lack of knowledge once again.......lower cr?
your not on your own with that one, i dont do abbreviations either ;D ;D

Compression Ratio?

Concentration Ratio :y
I like red cars

noel

Quote from: Auto Addict on 27 May 2012, 06:12:32
Quote from: jonnycool on 27 May 2012, 04:52:37
Quote from: noel on 26 May 2012, 10:19:29
Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 26 May 2012, 00:48:08
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 22:04:40
Quote from: Lampynoiseboy on 25 May 2012, 14:01:24
Quote from: TheBoy on 25 May 2012, 13:51:57
Had 500m from a tank in the 3.0l auto.  Never got close to that in the 3.2.  The 3.2 simply isn't anywhere near as economical.

Oddly, my current 3.2 seems better than both 3.0's I had before it....assumed better engine as newer design- even tho slightly larger?
Suspect the poxy, useless lower CR doesn't help matters...

to prove my lack of knowledge once again.......lower cr?
your not on your own with that one, i dont do abbreviations either ;D ;D

Compression Ratio?

Concentration Ratio :y
;D ;D ;D ;)
oh well that's another day done

TheBoy

Quote from: chrisgixer on 26 May 2012, 14:54:57
Quote from: TheBoy on 26 May 2012, 11:28:00
Quote from: chrisgixer on 26 May 2012, 02:01:54
Oh take no notice, even with a chip his couldn't pull away from mine. Without a chip, no chance.
I was giving you a good tow ;D

I suspect my compression isn't what it once was, going by oil consumption.  But the old girl kept you honest despite her extra 5-6yrs age and extra 100k miles...

But then this part of the thread is about fuel consumption differences, and no matter how I drive, I'll always get 250+ miles from 67l of LPG from the 3.0l. Remind me how many miles you get from a tank (bearing in mind, I don't think our driving styles should create much difference in MPG)?
fit injectors that don't lag then we'll see. :)
OK, take LPG out of equation. 24.5 - 25.5mpg on petrol on my commute in 3.0l. 22-23mpg on petrol in 3.2
Grumpy old man

TheBoy

Quote from: chrisgixer on 26 May 2012, 14:57:10
How much bhp is that chip worth, allegedly?
I think the BS figures are 10% or so? Actually, I vaguely recall 12%.  *BUT* we all know that is BS.

In reality, it probably puts back most of whats been lost over the years...
Grumpy old man