When you consider that GM spent millions (??) on research and development, why should there be a need to play around 'experimenting' trying to improve the original equipment? Suspension development is far more involved than tinkering around in your garage, and hit and miss trial and error experiments - as shown by the short life span of your wishbones once modified.
As said, since 2004 I have only replaced one set of wishbones, and never had any MOT failures or advisories for suspension components.
I have always tried to use genuine GM parts on my Omegas which may have been a great factor in their longevity, and considering the cheap tat in aftermarket parts that are available (and possibly the only source of replacement parts now if the opportunity wasn't taken to buy genuine parts when they were available at sensible money) the saying 'buy cheap buy twice' couldn't be more relevant.
In the Triumph classic car club I am a member of, many have modified their cars from standard in the attempt to gain a few more bhp or give the vehicle a more lowered look for example, but are often faced with headaches surrounding other problems/ issues that arise as a result.
The knowledge of the GM designers when the Omega was developed shouldn't be understated, and whilst improvements in vehicle design in today's vehicles is clearly leaps and bounds ahead of the original Omega development, from a personal point of view, I have never felt the need to mess around with the original specifications.
Maybe I'm a bit more sympathetic with my vehicles than some and possibly treat them with the respect they deserve?